B. Rienties, L. Toetenel, and A. Bryan. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge, page 315-319. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2015)
E. Novellino, B. Cosimelli, M. Ehlardo, G. Greco, M. Iadanza, A. Lavecchia, M. Rimoli, A. Sala, A. Settimo, G. Primofiore and 7 other author(s). J Med Chem, 48 (26):
8253-60(December 2005)Novellino, Ettore Cosimelli, Barbara Ehlardo, Marina Greco, Giovanni
Iadanza, Manuela Lavecchia, Antonio Rimoli, Maria Grazia Sala, Annalisa
Da Settimo, Antonio Primofiore, Giampaolo Da Settimo, Federico Taliani,
Sabrina La Motta, Concettina Klotz, Karl-Norbert Tuscano, Daniela
Trincavelli, Maria Letizia Martini, Claudia Research Support, Non-U.S.
Gov't United States Journal of medicinal chemistry J Med Chem. 2005
Dec 29;48(26):8253-60..
B. Latour, and A. Yaneva. Explorations in architecture: Teaching, design, research, (2008)"It is well known that we live in a very different world than that of Euclidian space: phenomenologists (and psychologists of the Gibsonian school) have never tired of showing that there is an immense distance in the way an embodied mind experiences its surroundings from the “objective” shape that “material” objects are said to possess. They have tried to add to the “Galilean” bodies rolling through Euclidian space, “human” bodies ambling through a “lived” environment. I All this is very well, except it does nothing more than to reproduce, at the level of architecture, the usual split between subjective and objective dimensions that has always paralyzed architectural theory—not to mention the well known split it has introduced between the architectural and engineering professions (and not to mention the catastrophic consequences it has had on philosophy proper). What is so strange in this argument is that it takes for granted that engineering drawings on a piece of paper and, later, projective geometry offer a good description of the so-called “material” world. This is the hidden presupposition in the whole of phenomenology: we have to add human subjective intentional dimensions to a “material” world that is well described by geometric shapes and mathematical calculations. The paradoxical aspect of this division of labor envisioned by those who want to add the “lived” dimensions of human perspective to the “objective” necessities of material existence is that, in order to avoid reducing humans to things, they first had to reduce things to drawings." p 82.