EasyBeans is an open-source Enterprise Java Beans (EJB) container hosted by the OW2 consortium. The License used by EasyBeans is the LGPL.
EasyBeans main goal is to ease the development of Enterprise Java Beans. It uses some new architecture design like the bytecode injection (with ASM ObjectWeb tool), IoC, POJO and can be embedded in OSGi bundles or other frameworks (Spring, Eclipse plugins, etc.).
It aims to provide an EJB3 container as specified in the Java Platform Enterprise Edition (Java EE) in its fifth version. It means that Session beans (Stateless or Stateful), Message Driven Beans (MDB) are available on EasyBeans.
The new persistence layer used by EJB 3.0 is now called Java Persistence API (or JPA). It replaces the CMP (Container Managed Persistence) model used by EJB 2.x. The default persistence provider used in EasyBeans is Hibernate Entity Manager or Apache OpenJPA but other JPA providers have been tested like for example Oracle TopLink Essentials.
This application is an end-to-end sample application for .NET Enterprise Application Server technologies. It is a service-oriented application based on Windows Communication Foundation (.NET 3.0) and ASP.NET, and illustrates many of the .NET enterprise development technologies for building highly scalable, rich "enterprise-connected" applications. It is designed as a benchmark kit to illustrate alternative technologies within .NET and their relative performance. The application offers full interoperability with Java Enterprise, including IBM WebSphere's Trade 6.1 sample application, and newly provided implementations on Oracle Application Server 10G (OC4J) and Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3 (Oracle implementations included with the download below). As such, the application offers an excellent opportunity for developers to learn about .NET and building interoperable, service-oriented applications.
Ever wondered how large enterprise scale systems are designed? Before major software development starts, we have to choose a suitable architecture that will provide us with the desired functionality…
Service-oriented architecture has proven to be a boon in the computing world. At its core, SOA provides enterprise patterns for systems development and integration where legacy systems are viewed as discrete business capabilities and packaged as standards-based services interfaces. SOA also typically describes an IT infrastructure that allows different applications to exchange data with one another as they participate within business processes. Over the past few years, SOA has grown almost exponentially in popularity, becoming one way for companies to knit together applications and processes in a flexible, reusable and cost-effective way. SOA separates functions into distinct units, or services, which developers make accessible to users over a network, ideally allowing them to combine and reuse them in the creation of business applications. These services communicate with each other by passing data from one service to another or by coordinating an activity between two or more services.
L. Botturi, M. Derntl, E. Boot, and K. Figl. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT2006). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE, (2006)
S. Angelov, P. Grefen, and D. Greefhorst. Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 2009 & European Conference on Software Architecture. WICSA/ECSA 2009, page 141--150. IEEE, (September 2009)
F. Akmel, E. Birhanu, B. Siraj, and S. Shifa. International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology (IJFCST), 7 (5/6):
01-12(November 2017)
J. Perez, E. Navarro, P. Letelier, and I. Ramos. Proc. IEEE Int'l Symp. and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based
Systems (ECBS), page 32--41. Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Press, (2006)
J. Perez, E. Navarro, P. Letelier, and I. Ramos. Proc. IEEE Int'l Symp. and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS), page 32--41. Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society Press, (2006)
X. Jia, S. Ying, H. Cao, and D. Xie. Sixth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing, 2007. GCC 2007, page 96--103. IEEE, (August 2007)
S. Römer, J. Mayer, F. Schweiggert, M. Maier, and T. Vollmer. Proceedings of the 25th conference on IASTED International Multi-Conference: Software Engineering, page 183--191. Anaheim, CA, USA, ACTA Press, (2007)
L. Ollinger, D. Zühlke, A. Theorin, and C. Johnsson. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA 2013), Cagliari, Italy, (2013)
K. Kontogiannis, G. Lewis, and D. Smith. Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Systems development in SOA environments, page 1--6. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2008)
M. Gaikwad, M. Gabhane, and M. Golait. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 3 (4):
1773--1777(April 2015)
M. Latoschik, and H. Tramberend. Software Engineering and Architectures for Realtime Interactive Systems (SEARIS), 2012 5th Workshop on, page 9-17. (March 2012)
M. Latoschik, and H. Tramberend. Software Engineering and Architectures for Realtime Interactive Systems (SEARIS), 2012 5th Workshop on, page 9-17. (March 2012)
S. Liscouët-Hanke, S. Pufe, and J. Maré. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 222 (6):
749-756(2008)
G. Di Fabbrizio, T. Okken, and J. Wilpon. Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on Multimodal interfaces, page 71--78. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2009)
Gokilavani, Ashin, Unnikrishnan, Sunder, and Ajay. IJIRIS:: International Journal of Innovative Research in Information Security, Volume VI (Issue IV):
102-107(May 2019)1. Arampatzis, T., et al. (2005) A Survey of Security Issues in Wireless Sensors Networks, in Intelligent Control. Proceeding of the IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation, 719-724. 2. Anna Gerber,” Simplify your IoT solution with IoT Architecture, IBM Document, 2017 3. Computing and its role in the internet of things,” in Proceedings of the 1st ACM MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, pp. 13–16, 2012 4. Charith Perera, Chi Harold Liu, Srimal Jayawardena―The Emerging Internet of Things marketplace From an Industrial Perspective: A Survey”,IEEE transactions on emerging topics in computing‖, 31 Jan 2015. 5. Chen, X.-Y. and Jin, Z.-G. (2012) Research on Key Technology and Applications for the Internet of Things. Physics Procedia, 33,561-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.104 6. F. Bonomi, R. Milito, P. Natarajan, and J. Zhu, “Fog computing: a platform for internet of things and analytics,” in Big Data and Internet of Things: A RoadMap for Smart Environments, pp. 169–186, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2014. 7. J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami,“Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements,and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29, no. 7,pp. 1645–1660, 2013. 8. Jayavardhana, G., Rajkumar, B., Marusic, S. and Palaniswami, M. (2013) Internet of Things: A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future Directions. Future Generation. 9. Sebastian, S., Ray, P.P., 2015. Development of IoT invasive architecture for complying with health of home. In: Proceedings of I3CS, Shillong, pp. 79–83. 10. Somayya Madakam, R. Ramaswamy, Siddharth Tripathi Internet of Things (IoT): A Literature Review Journal of Computer and Communications, 2015, 3, 164-173. Published Online May 2015 in SciRes. 11. Tuhin Borgohain, Uday Kumar, Sugata Sanyal,”Survey of Security and Privacy Issues of Internet of Things” Int. J. Advanced Networking and Applications Volume: 6 Issue: 4 Pages: 2372-2378 (2015) ISSN: 0975-0290. 12. The Internet of Things Reference Model, Whitepaper from Cisco 13. The Intel IoT platform, Architecture Specification White paper 14. Zeeshan Javeed,” Edge Analytics, the pros and cons of immediate local insight, 2017 blog ..
S. Giesecke, F. Marwede, M. Rohr, and W. Hasselbring. Proceedings of the 11th IASTED International Conference Software Engineering and Applications (SEA'2007), page 530-538. ACTA Press, (November 2007)
J. Bradbury, J. Cordy, J. Dingel, and M. Wermelinger. WOSS '04: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT workshop on Self-managed systems, page 28--33. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2004)
B. Latour, and A. Yaneva. Explorations in architecture: Teaching, design, research, (2008)"It is well known that we live in a very different world than that of Euclidian space: phenomenologists (and psychologists of the Gibsonian school) have never tired of showing that there is an immense distance in the way an embodied mind experiences its surroundings from the “objective” shape that “material” objects are said to possess. They have tried to add to the “Galilean” bodies rolling through Euclidian space, “human” bodies ambling through a “lived” environment. I All this is very well, except it does nothing more than to reproduce, at the level of architecture, the usual split between subjective and objective dimensions that has always paralyzed architectural theory—not to mention the well known split it has introduced between the architectural and engineering professions (and not to mention the catastrophic consequences it has had on philosophy proper). What is so strange in this argument is that it takes for granted that engineering drawings on a piece of paper and, later, projective geometry offer a good description of the so-called “material” world. This is the hidden presupposition in the whole of phenomenology: we have to add human subjective intentional dimensions to a “material” world that is well described by geometric shapes and mathematical calculations. The paradoxical aspect of this division of labor envisioned by those who want to add the “lived” dimensions of human perspective to the “objective” necessities of material existence is that, in order to avoid reducing humans to things, they first had to reduce things to drawings." p 82.