From post

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

, , , , , , , , и . Annals of internal medicine, 155 (8): 529-36 (октября 2011)6383<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Proves diagnòstiques; Critical appraisal; Checklist.
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed.

 

Другие публикации лиц с тем же именем

Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews., , , , , и . Journal of clinical epidemiology, 58 (10): 982-90 (октября 2005)5685<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; JID: 8801383; CIN: J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1331-2; author reply 1332-3. PMID: 17098577; RF: 46; 2004/07/26 received; 2005/01/10 revised; 2005/02/21 accepted; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Proves diagnòstiques.Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative., , , , , , , , , и . BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 326 (7379): 41-4 (января 2003)7132<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20120306; JID: 8900488; CIN: BMJ. 2003 Mar 15;326(7389):601. PMID: 12637417; CIN: BMJ. 2003 Jan 4;326(7379):3-4. PMID: 12511433; RF: 19; OID: NLM: PMC1124931; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació; Proves diagnòstiques.Artificial Intelligence and Statistics: Just the Old Wine in New Wineskins?, , , , , и . Frontiers Digit. Health, (2022)QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies., , , , , , , , и . Annals of internal medicine, 155 (8): 529-36 (октября 2011)6383<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Proves diagnòstiques; Critical appraisal; Checklist.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, , , , , , , , , и 16 other автор(ы). BMJ, (2021)Ethics methods are required as part of reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence in healthcare., , , , , , , , , и . Nat. Mach. Intell., 4 (4): 316-317 (2022)Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies., , , , , и . BMJ (Clinical research ed.), (января 2016)Proves diagnòstiques.Systematic reviews of studies quantifying the accuracy of diagnostic tests and markers., , , и . Clinical chemistry, 58 (11): 1534-45 (ноября 2012)7294<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>CI: (c) 2012; JID: 9421549; 2012/09/18 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Proves diagnòstiques; Metaanàlisi.Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research., и . Radiology, 277 (1): 13-21 (октября 2015)Metaanàlisi; Errors; Critical appraisal; Proves diagnòstiques; Radiologia.Development and evaluating multimarker models for guiding treatment decisions., , , , и . BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak., 18 (1): 52:1-52:10 (2018)