"IMIR är ett privat miljörättsligt institut. Formellt är det en bifirma till Åmyra förlag AB. Inom ramen för IMIR utförs forskning och utbildning och vissa slags miljöjuridiska uppdrag, företrädesvis för myndigheters, organisationers och vissa internationella organs räkning. Forskningen och utbildningen sker främst på uppdragsbasis. men viss egen forskning görs också. IMIR stöder i viss utsträckning forskning vid Uppsala universitet, främst i sådana hänseenden där universitetets resurser och funktioner är otillräckliga. Vidare publicerar IMIR Miljörättslig tidskrift samt även viss annan litteratur."
Andreas Whittam Smith 16.12.10: comparison of of al-qaida and anonymous "it is global, it is networked and it is decentralised", but: "Anonymous seems to lack a command structure (al-Qa'ida "central", as it is known, undoubtedly does have one)" "Mr Bobbitt didn't feel the need to explain "informational", but the WikiLeaks publications of US State Department cables and the subsequent so-called cyber war show what he had in mind. Who controls information is now a central issue... Mr Bobbitt's larger point is that the terrorism of the age always closely reflects the existing constitutional arrangements."
A Republican (?) video just before the recall elections i Wisconsin 2012. Blurb: "The Reclaim Wisconsin rally was filled with everything you need to know about the "Democracy" movement in Wisconsin. Here it is EXPOSED as a vulgar, childish, bullying mob!! Share the truth about Democracy in Wisconsin with friends - especially those in Wisconsin! Stand with Scott Walker on June 5th to prevent this mob rule from overcoming the rule of law in our beautiful Republic! God Bless the USA!!"
You Can't Opt Out 10 NSA Myths Debunked 1) NSA surveillance is legal. 2) If I’ve done nothing wrong, I have nothing to hide. So why should I care about any of this? 3) But the media says the NSA only collects my "phone metadata," so I'm safe. 5) But I trust Obama (Bush, the next president) on this. 6) But don't private companies like Facebook already have access to and share a lot of my personal data? So what's wrong with the government having it, too? 7) All this surveillance is distasteful and maybe even illegal, but isn’t it necessary to keep us safe? Isn’t it for our own good? Haven’t times changed and shouldn’t we acknowledge that? 8) Terrorists are everywhere and dangerous. 9) We've stayed safe. Doesn't that just prove all the government efforts have worked? 10) But doesn’t protecting America come first -- before anything?
Jeremy Brecher , Dec 2013 "Based on the Justinian Code’s protection of res communes, governments around the world have long served as trustees for rights held in common by the people...
”Det paaligger Statens Myndigheder at lægge Forholdene til Rette for en aaben og oplyst offentlig Samtale" vurderingene som Regjeringen Bondevik presenterte i mars 2004 gjennom Stortingsmelding nr. 26(2003-2004) Om endring av Grunnlovens §100. I kapittel 7 ”Infrastrukturkravet” kom argumentasjonen for grunnlovsfestingen av et krav til infrastruktur. Robert Vaagan
In a landmark decision issued today in the criminal appeal of U.S. v. Warshak, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the government must have a search warrant before it can secretly seize and search emails stored by email service providers. Cl