%0 Journal Article %1 vazire2018implications %A Vazire, Simine %D 2018 %J Perspectives on Psychological Science %K reproducibility %N 4 %P 411-417 %R 10.1177/1745691617751884 %T Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress %U /brokenurl# https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884 %V 13 %X The credibility revolution (sometimes referred to as the “replicability crisis”) in psychology has brought about many changes in the standards by which psychological science is evaluated. These changes include (a) greater emphasis on transparency and openness, (b) a move toward preregistration of research, (c) more direct-replication studies, and (d) higher standards for the quality and quantity of evidence needed to make strong scientific claims. What are the implications of these changes for productivity, creativity, and progress in psychological science? These questions can and should be studied empirically, and I present my predictions here. The productivity of individual researchers is likely to decline, although some changes (e.g., greater collaboration, data sharing) may mitigate this effect. The effects of these changes on creativity are likely to be mixed: Researchers will be less likely to pursue risky questions; more likely to use a broad range of methods, designs, and populations; and less free to define their own best practices and standards of evidence. Finally, the rate of scientific progress—the most important shared goal of scientists—is likely to increase as a result of these changes, although one’s subjective experience of making progress will likely become rarer.

@article{vazire2018implications, abstract = { The credibility revolution (sometimes referred to as the “replicability crisis”) in psychology has brought about many changes in the standards by which psychological science is evaluated. These changes include (a) greater emphasis on transparency and openness, (b) a move toward preregistration of research, (c) more direct-replication studies, and (d) higher standards for the quality and quantity of evidence needed to make strong scientific claims. What are the implications of these changes for productivity, creativity, and progress in psychological science? These questions can and should be studied empirically, and I present my predictions here. The productivity of individual researchers is likely to decline, although some changes (e.g., greater collaboration, data sharing) may mitigate this effect. The effects of these changes on creativity are likely to be mixed: Researchers will be less likely to pursue risky questions; more likely to use a broad range of methods, designs, and populations; and less free to define their own best practices and standards of evidence. Finally, the rate of scientific progress—the most important shared goal of scientists—is likely to increase as a result of these changes, although one’s subjective experience of making progress will likely become rarer. }, added-at = {2022-11-22T16:07:04.000+0100}, author = {Vazire, Simine}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24667f6bc89a601d2e69d8b95880af396/abernstetter}, doi = {10.1177/1745691617751884}, eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884}, interhash = {ee3cc9695098b9dd9ca865a07b1fc2f9}, intrahash = {4667f6bc89a601d2e69d8b95880af396}, journal = {Perspectives on Psychological Science}, keywords = {reproducibility}, note = {PMID: 29961410}, number = 4, pages = {411-417}, timestamp = {2022-11-22T16:07:04.000+0100}, title = {Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress}, url = {/brokenurl# https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884 }, volume = 13, year = 2018 }