Abstract
We propose a model-selection method to systematically evaluate the contribution to asset
pricing of any new factor, above and beyond what a high-dimensional set of existing factors
explains. Our methodology explicitly accounts for potential model-selection mistakes, unlike the
standard approaches that assume perfect variable selection, which rarely occurs in practice and
produces a bias due to the omitted variables. We apply our procedure to a set of factors recently
discovered in the literature. While most of these new factors are found to be redundant relative
to the existing factors, a few | such as protability | have statistically signicant explanatory
power beyond the hundreds of factors proposed in the past. In addition, we show that our
estimates and their signicance are stable, whereas the model selected by simple LASSO is not.
Users
This publication ist of type "preprint". To see comments and reviews from other users, you have to create your own comment or review for this post first.
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).