%0 Journal Article %1 leduc1994fractal %A Leduc, Alain %A Prairie, Yves T. %A Bergeron, Yves %D 1994 %I Kluwer Academic Publishers %J Landscape Ecology %K fractal_dimension fractal_landscape multifractal %N 4 %P 279-286 %R 10.1007/BF00129239 %T Fractal dimension estimates of a fragmented landscape: sources of variability %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00129239 %V 9 %X Although often seen as a scale-independent measure, we show that the fractal dimension of the forest cover of the Cazaville Region changes with spatial scale. Sources of variability in the estimation of fractal dimensions are multiple. First, the measured phenomenon does not always show the properties of a pure fractal for all scales, but rather exhibits local self-similarity within certain scale ranges. Moreover, some sampling components such as area of sampling unit, the use of a transect in the estimation of the variability of a plane, the location, and the orientation of a transect all affect, to different degrees, the estimation of the fractal dimension. This paper assesses the relative importance of these components in the estimation of the fractal dimension of the spatial distribution of woodlots in a fragmented landscape. Results show that different sources of variability should be considered when comparing fractal dimensions from different studies or regions.

@article{leduc1994fractal, abstract = {Although often seen as a scale-independent measure, we show that the fractal dimension of the forest cover of the Cazaville Region changes with spatial scale. Sources of variability in the estimation of fractal dimensions are multiple. First, the measured phenomenon does not always show the properties of a pure fractal for all scales, but rather exhibits local self-similarity within certain scale ranges. Moreover, some sampling components such as area of sampling unit, the use of a transect in the estimation of the variability of a plane, the location, and the orientation of a transect all affect, to different degrees, the estimation of the fractal dimension. This paper assesses the relative importance of these components in the estimation of the fractal dimension of the spatial distribution of woodlots in a fragmented landscape. Results show that different sources of variability should be considered when comparing fractal dimensions from different studies or regions.}, added-at = {2013-11-15T06:26:15.000+0100}, author = {Leduc, Alain and Prairie, Yves T. and Bergeron, Yves}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/264dc2f4146843a6e234d5ff8e1fbb07c/peter.ralph}, doi = {10.1007/BF00129239}, interhash = {acd91d39eb5b6e2254b80221c9de5735}, intrahash = {64dc2f4146843a6e234d5ff8e1fbb07c}, issn = {0921-2973}, journal = {Landscape Ecology}, keywords = {fractal_dimension fractal_landscape multifractal}, language = {English}, number = 4, pages = {279-286}, publisher = {Kluwer Academic Publishers}, timestamp = {2013-11-15T06:26:15.000+0100}, title = {Fractal dimension estimates of a fragmented landscape: sources of variability}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00129239}, volume = 9, year = 1994 }