Article,

Designed delays versus rigorous pragmatic trials: lower carat gold standards can produce relevant drug evaluations.

, , and .
Medical care, 45 (10 Supl 2): S44-9 (October 2007)6352<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>GR: AG19463/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States; JID: 0230027; 0 (Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors); ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>CER.
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318068932a

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Centralized administrative databases enable low-cost pragmatic randomized trials (PRTs) of drug effectiveness and safety. We simplified the PRT strategy by using designed delays (DD) to evaluate drug policies. OBJECTIVES: To reassess our DD trial of a cost-saving nebulizer-to-inhaler conversion policy and a proposed DD trial of reduced restrictions on Cox-2 inhibitors. RESEARCH DESIGN: We randomized 52 pairs of communities and clusters of physician practices to the policy either on time or after a 6-month delay. Our 2-stage qualitative reassessment comprised: (1) applying criteria for reporting PRTs and (2) assessing DD trials in 3 domains of responsibility: policymakers' decisions, researchers' decisions, and joint decisions involving negotiation. MEASURES: A draft checklist of 22 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). Researchers' recollections of their degree of influence on decisions. RESULTS: DD trials deviated from ideal PRTs in the policymakers' domain: the policies affected mixtures of drugs, users, and illnesses, and implementation was not by strict protocol. Aspects negotiated by researchers and policymakers also deviated from ideal: length of delay; size and location of control group; unit of randomization; additional data collection; and communications to physicians. The DD trials complied better with CONSORT in the researchers' domain of analysis and interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: DD trials can be negotiated with policymakers. Low cost and simplicity of DD trials partly compensate for some limitations for evaluating drug safety and effectiveness. The ethics question of whether a DD is routine evaluation or research depends on its purpose and generalizability.

Tags

Users

  • @jepcastel

Comments and Reviews