Description and analysis of existing knowledge managementframeworks
C. Holsapple, and K. Joshi. System Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on, Track1, page 15 pp.-. (1999)
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772796
Abstract
There is a growing recognition in the business community about the
importance of managing knowledge. Some organizations have taken
initiatives to understand and manage this critical resource. Major
organizations have appointed chief knowledge officers (CKOs) and chief
learning officers to formally initiate and cultivate KM activities in
their organizations. In spite of these initiatives, the bulk of
organizations still have not approached knowledge management (KM)
activity formally or deliberately. The cause for this lack of effective
management of knowledge could be that most organizations are still
struggling to comprehend the KM concept. The reason for this confusion
and lack of clarity can be attributed to a gap between the emerging KM
phenomena and the current lack of understanding about this phenomena by
researchers and practitioners. To bridge the gap, the fundamental issue
of identifying salient characteristics of KM phenomena needs to be
addressed. This is a prerequisite for systematic research into the
nature and possibilities of KM, as well as for easing the emergence of
KM into practice. Researchers have proposed a variety of KM framework
models and perspectives to help understand this emerging phenomenon.
Each of them addresses certain KM elements. However, none of them
appears to subsume all of the others. The major contribution of this
paper is that it presents a summary and comparative analysis of these
frameworks
Description
Description and analysis of existing knowledge managementframeworks
%0 Conference Paper
%1 772796
%A Holsapple, C.W.
%A Joshi, K.D.
%B System Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on
%D 1999
%K frameworks knowledge management
%P 15 pp.-
%R 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772796
%T Description and analysis of existing knowledge managementframeworks
%U http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=772796
%V Track1
%X There is a growing recognition in the business community about the
importance of managing knowledge. Some organizations have taken
initiatives to understand and manage this critical resource. Major
organizations have appointed chief knowledge officers (CKOs) and chief
learning officers to formally initiate and cultivate KM activities in
their organizations. In spite of these initiatives, the bulk of
organizations still have not approached knowledge management (KM)
activity formally or deliberately. The cause for this lack of effective
management of knowledge could be that most organizations are still
struggling to comprehend the KM concept. The reason for this confusion
and lack of clarity can be attributed to a gap between the emerging KM
phenomena and the current lack of understanding about this phenomena by
researchers and practitioners. To bridge the gap, the fundamental issue
of identifying salient characteristics of KM phenomena needs to be
addressed. This is a prerequisite for systematic research into the
nature and possibilities of KM, as well as for easing the emergence of
KM into practice. Researchers have proposed a variety of KM framework
models and perspectives to help understand this emerging phenomenon.
Each of them addresses certain KM elements. However, none of them
appears to subsume all of the others. The major contribution of this
paper is that it presents a summary and comparative analysis of these
frameworks
%@ 0-7695-0001-3
@inproceedings{772796,
abstract = {There is a growing recognition in the business community about the
importance of managing knowledge. Some organizations have taken
initiatives to understand and manage this critical resource. Major
organizations have appointed chief knowledge officers (CKOs) and chief
learning officers to formally initiate and cultivate KM activities in
their organizations. In spite of these initiatives, the bulk of
organizations still have not approached knowledge management (KM)
activity formally or deliberately. The cause for this lack of effective
management of knowledge could be that most organizations are still
struggling to comprehend the KM concept. The reason for this confusion
and lack of clarity can be attributed to a gap between the emerging KM
phenomena and the current lack of understanding about this phenomena by
researchers and practitioners. To bridge the gap, the fundamental issue
of identifying salient characteristics of KM phenomena needs to be
addressed. This is a prerequisite for systematic research into the
nature and possibilities of KM, as well as for easing the emergence of
KM into practice. Researchers have proposed a variety of KM framework
models and perspectives to help understand this emerging phenomenon.
Each of them addresses certain KM elements. However, none of them
appears to subsume all of the others. The major contribution of this
paper is that it presents a summary and comparative analysis of these
frameworks},
added-at = {2008-02-28T16:29:14.000+0100},
author = {Holsapple, C.W. and Joshi, K.D.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b43cf6f7bc9411f1ba2adc636e4050e9/dadalino},
booktitle = {System Sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on},
description = {Description and analysis of existing knowledge managementframeworks},
doi = {10.1109/HICSS.1999.772796},
interhash = {f893da5c6304be90c086579d64e6b385},
intrahash = {b43cf6f7bc9411f1ba2adc636e4050e9},
isbn = {0-7695-0001-3},
keywords = {frameworks knowledge management},
pages = {15 pp.-},
timestamp = {2008-03-04T11:31:23.000+0100},
title = {Description and analysis of existing knowledge managementframeworks},
url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=772796},
volume = {Track1},
year = 1999
}