A. Ramsay. Temporal Representation and Reasoning, 2002. TIME 2002. Proceedings.Ninth International Symposium on, page 116-123. (2002)
DOI: 10.1109/TIME.2002.1027484
Abstract
Many natural languages use prepositions to mark relations between entities of various kinds-between physical entities and their spatial locations, between temporal entities and their temporal locations, between abstract entities of various kinds (e.g. between ideas and their 'mental locations'). I show that the consequences of using prepositions to relate temporal entities emerge naturally from the basic interpretations of the prepositions themselves together with a very weak logic of events, where I take it that prepositions denote abstract relations whose significance only emerges when properties of the related items are taken into consideration.
Description
Welcome to IEEE Xplore 2.0: Temporal views as abstract relations
%0 Conference Paper
%1 ramsay02views
%A Ramsay, A.
%B Temporal Representation and Reasoning, 2002. TIME 2002. Proceedings.Ninth International Symposium on
%D 2002
%K research.conceptual.time research.nlp
%P 116-123
%R 10.1109/TIME.2002.1027484
%T Temporal views as abstract relations
%X Many natural languages use prepositions to mark relations between entities of various kinds-between physical entities and their spatial locations, between temporal entities and their temporal locations, between abstract entities of various kinds (e.g. between ideas and their 'mental locations'). I show that the consequences of using prepositions to relate temporal entities emerge naturally from the basic interpretations of the prepositions themselves together with a very weak logic of events, where I take it that prepositions denote abstract relations whose significance only emerges when properties of the related items are taken into consideration.
@inproceedings{ramsay02views,
abstract = { Many natural languages use prepositions to mark relations between entities of various kinds-between physical entities and their spatial locations, between temporal entities and their temporal locations, between abstract entities of various kinds (e.g. between ideas and their 'mental locations'). I show that the consequences of using prepositions to relate temporal entities emerge naturally from the basic interpretations of the prepositions themselves together with a very weak logic of events, where I take it that prepositions denote abstract relations whose significance only emerges when properties of the related items are taken into consideration.},
added-at = {2009-06-30T15:52:42.000+0200},
author = {Ramsay, A.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28b07a1c2b0067a2c5ed1908d03eb28a8/msn},
booktitle = {Temporal Representation and Reasoning, 2002. TIME 2002. Proceedings.Ninth International Symposium on},
description = {Welcome to IEEE Xplore 2.0: Temporal views as abstract relations},
doi = {10.1109/TIME.2002.1027484},
interhash = {6a7d2586dc1ed8d522d1d85434093c53},
intrahash = {8b07a1c2b0067a2c5ed1908d03eb28a8},
issn = {1530-1311},
keywords = {research.conceptual.time research.nlp},
pages = { 116-123},
timestamp = {2009-06-30T15:52:43.000+0200},
title = {Temporal views as abstract relations},
year = 2002
}