@kirk86

When are Non-Parametric Methods Robust?

, and . (2020)cite arxiv:2003.06121Comment: under review for ICML 2020.

Abstract

A growing body of research has shown that many classifiers are susceptible to adversarial examples -- small strategic modifications to test inputs that lead to misclassification. In this work, we study general non-parametric methods, with a view towards understanding when they are robust to these modifications. We establish general conditions under which non-parametric methods are r-consistent -- in the sense that they converge to optimally robust and accurate classifiers in the large sample limit. Concretely, our results show that when data is well-separated, nearest neighbors and kernel classifiers are r-consistent, while histograms are not. For general data distributions, we prove that preprocessing by Adversarial Pruning (Yang et. al., 2019) -- that makes data well-separated -- followed by nearest neighbors or kernel classifiers also leads to r-consistency.

Description

[2003.06121] When are Non-Parametric Methods Robust?

Links and resources

Tags

community

  • @kirk86
  • @dblp
@kirk86's tags highlighted