%0 Journal Article %1 Castellano2005Comparison %A Castellano, Claudio %A Loreto, Vittorio %A Barrat, Alain %A Cecconi, Federico %A Parisi, Domenico %D 2005 %I American Physical Society %J Physical Review E %K ising-glauber-model, majority-vote, opinion-models networks %N 6 %P 066107+ %R 10.1103/physreve.71.066107 %T Comparison of voter and Glauber ordering dynamics on networks %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.066107 %V 71 %X We study numerically the ordering process of two very simple dynamical models for a two-state variable on several topologies with increasing levels of heterogeneity in the degree distribution. We find that the zero-temperature Glauber dynamics for the Ising model may get trapped in sets of partially ordered metastable states even for finite system size, and this becomes more probable as the size increases. Voter dynamics instead always converges to full order on finite networks, even if this does not occur via coherent growth of domains. The time needed for order to be reached diverges with the system size. In both cases the ordering process is rather insensitive to the variation of the degreee distribution from sharply peaked to scale free.

@article{Castellano2005Comparison, abstract = {{We study numerically the ordering process of two very simple dynamical models for a two-state variable on several topologies with increasing levels of heterogeneity in the degree distribution. We find that the zero-temperature Glauber dynamics for the Ising model may get trapped in sets of partially ordered metastable states even for finite system size, and this becomes more probable as the size increases. Voter dynamics instead always converges to full order on finite networks, even if this does not occur via coherent growth of domains. The time needed for order to be reached diverges with the system size. In both cases the ordering process is rather insensitive to the variation of the degreee distribution from sharply peaked to scale free.}}, added-at = {2019-06-10T14:53:09.000+0200}, author = {Castellano, Claudio and Loreto, Vittorio and Barrat, Alain and Cecconi, Federico and Parisi, Domenico}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/256dc357da203277735519742e8147416/nonancourt}, citeulike-article-id = {4363132}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.066107}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRE/v71/i6/e066107}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://link.aps.org/pdf/PRE/v71/i6/e066107}, doi = {10.1103/physreve.71.066107}, interhash = {57a07cf31da95f7ca4b3cb7940663f0a}, intrahash = {56dc357da203277735519742e8147416}, journal = {Physical Review E}, keywords = {ising-glauber-model, majority-vote, opinion-models networks}, month = jun, number = 6, pages = {066107+}, posted-at = {2012-09-06 23:08:26}, priority = {2}, publisher = {American Physical Society}, timestamp = {2019-07-31T12:26:38.000+0200}, title = {{Comparison of voter and Glauber ordering dynamics on networks}}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.066107}, volume = 71, year = 2005 }