We examine the relation between media coverage and the cross-sectional dispersion of stock
returns. We find a significant return premium on stocks with no media coverage: On average,
these stocks out-perform stocks with high media coverage by 0.23% per month, after accounting
for market, size, book-to-market, momentum, and liquidity. For small stocks, stocks with low
analyst following, and stocks primarily owned by individuals, the risk-adjusted return premium
is 0.65%-1% per month. These findings support the notion that information affects the cross-
sectional dispersion of returns as in the models of Merton (1987) and Easley and O’Hara (2004).
Liquidity and investor behavior, however, do not explain this return premium.
%0 Journal Article
%1 fanga2007
%A Fanga, Joel Peress Lily
%D 2007
%K d3
%T Media Coverage and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
%X We examine the relation between media coverage and the cross-sectional dispersion of stock
returns. We find a significant return premium on stocks with no media coverage: On average,
these stocks out-perform stocks with high media coverage by 0.23% per month, after accounting
for market, size, book-to-market, momentum, and liquidity. For small stocks, stocks with low
analyst following, and stocks primarily owned by individuals, the risk-adjusted return premium
is 0.65%-1% per month. These findings support the notion that information affects the cross-
sectional dispersion of returns as in the models of Merton (1987) and Easley and O’Hara (2004).
Liquidity and investor behavior, however, do not explain this return premium.
@article{fanga2007,
abstract = {We examine the relation between media coverage and the cross-sectional dispersion of stock
returns. We find a significant return premium on stocks with no media coverage: On average,
these stocks out-perform stocks with high media coverage by 0.23% per month, after accounting
for market, size, book-to-market, momentum, and liquidity. For small stocks, stocks with low
analyst following, and stocks primarily owned by individuals, the risk-adjusted return premium
is 0.65%-1% per month. These findings support the notion that information affects the cross-
sectional dispersion of returns as in the models of Merton (1987) and Easley and O’Hara (2004).
Liquidity and investor behavior, however, do not explain this return premium.
},
added-at = {2009-03-03T13:34:44.000+0100},
author = {Fanga, Joel Peress Lily},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2562e2d68ffd0b8d48ba327adf39da8c2/enterldestodes},
interhash = {3728a3c121b3c71e51825778111fad9b},
intrahash = {562e2d68ffd0b8d48ba327adf39da8c2},
keywords = {d3},
timestamp = {2009-03-03T13:34:44.000+0100},
title = {Media Coverage and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns},
year = 2007
}