%0 Generic %1 huang2020energy %A Huang, Hung-Jin %A Eifler, Tim %A Mandelbaum, Rachel %A Bernstein, Gary M. %A Chen, Anqi %A Choi, Ami %A García-Bellido, Juan %A Huterer, Dragan %A Krause, Elisabeth %A Rozo, Eduardo %A Singh, Sukhdeep %A Bridle, Sarah %A DeRose, Joseph %A Elvin-Pole, Jack %A Fang, Xiao %A Friedrich, Oliver %A Gatti, Marco %A Gaztanaga, Enrique %A Gruen, Daniel %A Hartley, Will %A Hoyle, Ben %A Jarvis, Mike %A MacCrann, Niall %A Rau, Markus %A Miranda, Vivian %A Prat, Judit %A Sánchez, Carles %A Samuroff, Simon %A Troxel, Michael %A Zuntz, Joe %A Abbott, Tim %A Aguena, Michel %A Annis, James %A Avila, Santiago %A Becker, Matthew %A Bertin, Emmanuel %A Brooks, David %A Burke, David %A Rosell, Aurelio Carnero %A Kind, Matias Carrasco %A Carretero, Jorge %A Castander, Francisco Javier %A da Costa, Luiz %A De Vicente, Juan %A Dietrich, Jörg %A Doel, Peter %A Everett, Spencer %A Flaugher, Brenna %A Fosalba, Pablo %A Frieman, Josh %A Gruendl, Robert %A Gutierrez, Gaston %A Hinton, Samuel %A Honscheid, Klaus %A James, David %A Kuehn, Kyler %A Lahav, Ofer %A Lima, Marcos %A Maia, Marcio %A Marshall, Jennifer %A Menanteau, Felipe %A Miquel, Ramon %A Paz-Chinchón, Francisco %A Malagón, Andrés Plazas %A Romer, Kathy %A Roodman, Aaron %A Sanchez, Eusebio %A Scarpine, Vic %A Serrano, Santiago %A Sevilla, Ignacio %A Smith, Mathew %A Soares-Santos, Marcelle %A Suchyta, Eric %A Swanson, Molly %A Tarle, Gregory %A Thomas, Diehl H. %A Weller, Jochen %D 2020 %K library %T Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraining Baryonic Physics in the Universe %U http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15026 %X Measurements of large-scale structure are interpreted using theoretical predictions for the matter distribution, including potential impacts of baryonic physics. We constrain the feedback strength of baryons jointly with cosmology using weak lensing and galaxy clustering observables (3$\times$2pt) of Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 data in combination with external information from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and Planck cosmic microwave background polarization. Our baryon modeling is informed by a set of hydrodynamical simulations that span a variety of baryon scenarios; we span this space via a Principal Component (PC) analysis of the summary statistics extracted from these simulations. We show that at the level of DES Y1 constraining power, one PC is sufficient to describe the variation of baryonic effects in the observables, and the first PC amplitude ($Q_1$) generally reflects the strength of baryon feedback. With the upper limit of $Q_1$ prior being bound by the Illustris feedback scenarios, we reach $20\%$ improvement in the constraint of $S_8=\sigma_8(Ømega_\rm m/0.3)^0.5=0.788^+0.018_-0.021$ compared to the original DES 3$\times$2pt analysis. This gain is driven by the inclusion of small-scale cosmic shear information down to 2.5$\arcmin$, which was excluded in previous DES analyses that did not model baryonic physics. We obtain $S_8=0.781^+0.014_-0.015$ for the combined DES Y1+Planck EE+BAO analysis with a non-informative $Q_1$ prior. In terms of the baryon constraints, we measure $Q_1=1.14^+2.20_-2.80$ for DES Y1 only and $Q_1=1.42^+1.63_-1.48$ for DESY1+Planck EE+BAO, allowing us to exclude one of the most extreme AGN feedback hydrodynamical scenario at more than $2 \sigma$.

@misc{huang2020energy, abstract = {Measurements of large-scale structure are interpreted using theoretical predictions for the matter distribution, including potential impacts of baryonic physics. We constrain the feedback strength of baryons jointly with cosmology using weak lensing and galaxy clustering observables (3$\times$2pt) of Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 data in combination with external information from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and Planck cosmic microwave background polarization. Our baryon modeling is informed by a set of hydrodynamical simulations that span a variety of baryon scenarios; we span this space via a Principal Component (PC) analysis of the summary statistics extracted from these simulations. We show that at the level of DES Y1 constraining power, one PC is sufficient to describe the variation of baryonic effects in the observables, and the first PC amplitude ($Q_1$) generally reflects the strength of baryon feedback. With the upper limit of $Q_1$ prior being bound by the Illustris feedback scenarios, we reach $\sim 20\%$ improvement in the constraint of $S_8=\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}=0.788^{+0.018}_{-0.021}$ compared to the original DES 3$\times$2pt analysis. This gain is driven by the inclusion of small-scale cosmic shear information down to 2.5$\arcmin$, which was excluded in previous DES analyses that did not model baryonic physics. We obtain $S_8=0.781^{+0.014}_{-0.015}$ for the combined DES Y1+Planck EE+BAO analysis with a non-informative $Q_1$ prior. In terms of the baryon constraints, we measure $Q_1=1.14^{+2.20}_{-2.80}$ for DES Y1 only and $Q_1=1.42^{+1.63}_{-1.48}$ for DESY1+Planck EE+BAO, allowing us to exclude one of the most extreme AGN feedback hydrodynamical scenario at more than $2 \sigma$.}, added-at = {2020-07-31T13:34:53.000+0200}, author = {Huang, Hung-Jin and Eifler, Tim and Mandelbaum, Rachel and Bernstein, Gary M. and Chen, Anqi and Choi, Ami and García-Bellido, Juan and Huterer, Dragan and Krause, Elisabeth and Rozo, Eduardo and Singh, Sukhdeep and Bridle, Sarah and DeRose, Joseph and Elvin-Pole, Jack and Fang, Xiao and Friedrich, Oliver and Gatti, Marco and Gaztanaga, Enrique and Gruen, Daniel and Hartley, Will and Hoyle, Ben and Jarvis, Mike and MacCrann, Niall and Rau, Markus and Miranda, Vivian and Prat, Judit and Sánchez, Carles and Samuroff, Simon and Troxel, Michael and Zuntz, Joe and Abbott, Tim and Aguena, Michel and Annis, James and Avila, Santiago and Becker, Matthew and Bertin, Emmanuel and Brooks, David and Burke, David and Rosell, Aurelio Carnero and Kind, Matias Carrasco and Carretero, Jorge and Castander, Francisco Javier and da Costa, Luiz and De Vicente, Juan and Dietrich, Jörg and Doel, Peter and Everett, Spencer and Flaugher, Brenna and Fosalba, Pablo and Frieman, Josh and Gruendl, Robert and Gutierrez, Gaston and Hinton, Samuel and Honscheid, Klaus and James, David and Kuehn, Kyler and Lahav, Ofer and Lima, Marcos and Maia, Marcio and Marshall, Jennifer and Menanteau, Felipe and Miquel, Ramon and Paz-Chinchón, Francisco and Malagón, Andrés Plazas and Romer, Kathy and Roodman, Aaron and Sanchez, Eusebio and Scarpine, Vic and Serrano, Santiago and Sevilla, Ignacio and Smith, Mathew and Soares-Santos, Marcelle and Suchyta, Eric and Swanson, Molly and Tarle, Gregory and Thomas, Diehl H. and Weller, Jochen}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20fd19f4298ff9f17c8c9e568cb56ac26/gpkulkarni}, description = {Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraining Baryonic Physics in the Universe}, interhash = {c8fe2610049b8af7f13e1567e9af069f}, intrahash = {0fd19f4298ff9f17c8c9e568cb56ac26}, keywords = {library}, note = {cite arxiv:2007.15026Comment: 24 pages, 18 figures, 2 tables. submitted to MNRAS. A brief video summary of this paper is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbeNwk5papU}, timestamp = {2020-07-31T13:34:53.000+0200}, title = {Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraining Baryonic Physics in the Universe}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15026}, year = 2020 }