%0 Journal Article %1 kurten_dual-action_2023 %A Kürten, Jens %A Raettig, Tim %A Gutzeit, Julian %A Huestegge, Lynn %D 2023 %J Psychological Research %K imported %N 2 %P 410--424 %R 10.1007/s00426-022-01672-0 %T Dual-action benefits: global (action-inherent) and local (transient) sources of action prepotency underlying inhibition failures in multiple action control %U https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01672-0 %V 87 %X Previous research has shown that the simultaneous execution of two actions (instead of only one) is not necessarily more difficult but can actually be easier (less error-prone), in particular when executing one action requires the simultaneous inhibition of another action. Corresponding inhibitory demands are particularly challenging when the to-be-inhibited action is highly prepotent (i.e., characterized by a strong urge to be executed). Here, we study a range of important potential sources of such prepotency. Building on a previously established paradigm to elicit dual-action benefits, participants responded to stimuli with single actions (either manual button press or saccade) or dual actions (button press and saccade). Crucially, we compared blocks in which these response demands were randomly intermixed (mixed blocks) with pure blocks involving only one type of response demand. The results highlight the impact of global (action-inherent) sources of action prepotency, as reflected in more pronounced inhibitory failures in saccade vs. manual control, but also more local (transient) sources of influence, as reflected in a greater probability of inhibition failures following trials that required the to-be-inhibited type of action. In addition, sequential analyses revealed that inhibitory control (including its failure) is exerted at the level of response modality representations, not at the level of fully specified response representations. In sum, the study highlights important preconditions and mechanisms underlying the observation of dual-action benefits.

@article{kurten_dual-action_2023, abstract = {Previous research has shown that the simultaneous execution of two actions (instead of only one) is not necessarily more difficult but can actually be easier (less error-prone), in particular when executing one action requires the simultaneous inhibition of another action. Corresponding inhibitory demands are particularly challenging when the to-be-inhibited action is highly prepotent (i.e., characterized by a strong urge to be executed). Here, we study a range of important potential sources of such prepotency. Building on a previously established paradigm to elicit dual-action benefits, participants responded to stimuli with single actions (either manual button press or saccade) or dual actions (button press and saccade). Crucially, we compared blocks in which these response demands were randomly intermixed (mixed blocks) with pure blocks involving only one type of response demand. The results highlight the impact of global (action-inherent) sources of action prepotency, as reflected in more pronounced inhibitory failures in saccade vs. manual control, but also more local (transient) sources of influence, as reflected in a greater probability of inhibition failures following trials that required the to-be-inhibited type of action. In addition, sequential analyses revealed that inhibitory control (including its failure) is exerted at the level of response modality representations, not at the level of fully specified response representations. In sum, the study highlights important preconditions and mechanisms underlying the observation of dual-action benefits.}, added-at = {2024-03-13T10:34:51.000+0100}, author = {Kürten, Jens and Raettig, Tim and Gutzeit, Julian and Huestegge, Lynn}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2dd78f72f37c199e3b92f2dd3f3febdcd/jens_k}, copyright = {All rights reserved}, doi = {10.1007/s00426-022-01672-0}, file = {Kürten et al_2023_Dual-action benefits.pdf:G\:\\Meine Ablage\\Work\\literature\\zotero\\Kürten et al_2023_Dual-action benefits2.pdf:application/pdf}, interhash = {619f246cf57395df3eb1554bc42a628d}, intrahash = {dd78f72f37c199e3b92f2dd3f3febdcd}, issn = {1430-2772}, journal = {Psychological Research}, keywords = {imported}, language = {en}, month = mar, number = 2, pages = {410--424}, shorttitle = {Dual-action benefits}, timestamp = {2024-03-13T10:34:51.000+0100}, title = {Dual-action benefits: global (action-inherent) and local (transient) sources of action prepotency underlying inhibition failures in multiple action control}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01672-0}, urldate = {2023-12-06}, volume = 87, year = 2023 }