%0 Journal Article %1 cefaliello0offering %A Cefaliello, Aude %A Kullmann, Miriam %D 2022 %J European Labour Law Journal %K AI_Act European_Union artificial_intelligence labour_rights regulation %N 0 %P 20319525221114474 %R 10.1177/20319525221114474 %T Offering false security: How the draft artificial intelligence act undermines fundamental workers rights %U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20319525221114474 %V 0 %X In April 2021, the European Commission published its first draft of the Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence. Since AI in the work context has increasingly become important in organising work and managing workers, the AI Act will undoubtedly have an impact on EU and national labour law systems. One aim of the proposal is to guarantee ‘consistency with existing Union legislation applicable to sectors where high-risk Artificial Intelligence systems are already used or likely to be used in the near future’, which includes the EU social acquis. It could be argued that ensuring true consistency with EU law means guaranteeing that the way the AI Act will be implemented and applied will still allow the other pieces of EU labour law to fulfil their purpose. It is undeniable that the implementation of the AI Act will overlap with various fields of EU law, especially considering the increasing use of AI technology at work. Thus, this article seeks to identify ways to refine the AI Act, insofar as it impacts work. The contribution discusses the current AI Act as proposed in April 2021, thereby focusing on two particular areas, EU non-discrimination law and EU law on occupational health and safety (OSH), as these two areas are, more or less explicitly, addressed as legal fields in the AI Act. The article starts with taking the perspective of EU labour law influencing the development of AI systems used in the employment context. We argue that providers should respect EU labour law throughout the development of the AI system (section 2). Then, the areas where EU labour law and the AI overlap are identified, thereby viewing it from an employer's perspective, i.e., the user of the AI system (section 3). Using two specific EU labour law areas (the right not to be discriminated against and the right to healthy and safe working conditions) the article provides a first assessment of how the AI Act might influence work and the regulation thereof (section 4). Finally, the conclusion critically explores whether and to what extent AI in employment situations warrants particular attention (section 5).

@article{cefaliello0offering, abstract = {In April 2021, the European Commission published its first draft of the Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence. Since AI in the work context has increasingly become important in organising work and managing workers, the AI Act will undoubtedly have an impact on EU and national labour law systems. One aim of the proposal is to guarantee ‘consistency with existing Union legislation applicable to sectors where high-risk Artificial Intelligence systems are already used or likely to be used in the near future’, which includes the EU social acquis. It could be argued that ensuring true consistency with EU law means guaranteeing that the way the AI Act will be implemented and applied will still allow the other pieces of EU labour law to fulfil their purpose. It is undeniable that the implementation of the AI Act will overlap with various fields of EU law, especially considering the increasing use of AI technology at work. Thus, this article seeks to identify ways to refine the AI Act, insofar as it impacts work. The contribution discusses the current AI Act as proposed in April 2021, thereby focusing on two particular areas, EU non-discrimination law and EU law on occupational health and safety (OSH), as these two areas are, more or less explicitly, addressed as legal fields in the AI Act. The article starts with taking the perspective of EU labour law influencing the development of AI systems used in the employment context. We argue that providers should respect EU labour law throughout the development of the AI system (section 2). Then, the areas where EU labour law and the AI overlap are identified, thereby viewing it from an employer's perspective, i.e., the user of the AI system (section 3). Using two specific EU labour law areas (the right not to be discriminated against and the right to healthy and safe working conditions) the article provides a first assessment of how the AI Act might influence work and the regulation thereof (section 4). Finally, the conclusion critically explores whether and to what extent AI in employment situations warrants particular attention (section 5). }, added-at = {2022-10-21T00:35:46.000+0200}, author = {Cefaliello, Aude and Kullmann, Miriam}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2fa50aa175d42b3d73f2a1a3227fe364b/meneteqel}, doi = {10.1177/20319525221114474}, eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525221114474}, interhash = {b1e70d17585137798ad258b7517a1653}, intrahash = {fa50aa175d42b3d73f2a1a3227fe364b}, journal = {European Labour Law Journal}, keywords = {AI_Act European_Union artificial_intelligence labour_rights regulation}, language = {en}, number = 0, pages = 20319525221114474, timestamp = {2022-10-21T00:35:46.000+0200}, title = {Offering false security: How the draft artificial intelligence act undermines fundamental workers rights}, url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20319525221114474}, volume = 0, year = 2022 }