n this month's issue of Nature Biotechnology, I join with other authors to suggest several bold new initiatives in science communication and journalism. The Commentary article includes an overview of key issues and trends in the field and closes with a series of specific recommendations.
The article is based on a workshop held this past year in Washington, DC, organized by Timothy Caulfield and Tania Bubela of the Health Law Institute at the University of Alberta. The authors reflect the participants in that workshop and include representatives from the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany and Australia.
Description
As new media proliferate and the public’s trust and engagement in science are influenced by industry involvement in academic research, an interdisciplinary workshop provides some recommendations to enhance science communication.
%0 Journal Article
%1 bubela2009science
%A et.al, Tania Bubela
%D 2009
%J Nature Biotechnology
%K Wissenschaftsjournalismus science_journalism wissenschaftskommunikation
%T Science communication reconsidered.
%X n this month's issue of Nature Biotechnology, I join with other authors to suggest several bold new initiatives in science communication and journalism. The Commentary article includes an overview of key issues and trends in the field and closes with a series of specific recommendations.
The article is based on a workshop held this past year in Washington, DC, organized by Timothy Caulfield and Tania Bubela of the Health Law Institute at the University of Alberta. The authors reflect the participants in that workshop and include representatives from the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany and Australia.
@article{bubela2009science,
abstract = {n this month's issue of Nature Biotechnology, I join with other authors to suggest several bold new initiatives in science communication and journalism. The Commentary article includes an overview of key issues and trends in the field and closes with a series of specific recommendations.
The article is based on a workshop held this past year in Washington, DC, organized by Timothy Caulfield and Tania Bubela of the Health Law Institute at the University of Alberta. The authors reflect the participants in that workshop and include representatives from the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany and Australia.},
added-at = {2009-06-22T23:23:57.000+0200},
author = {et.al, Tania Bubela},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/278403f35583483ff871f59049f46bb32/acf},
description = {As new media proliferate and the public’s trust and engagement in science are influenced by industry involvement in academic research, an interdisciplinary workshop provides some recommendations to enhance science communication.},
interhash = {329981a52667ec740271622fe2877dac},
intrahash = {78403f35583483ff871f59049f46bb32},
journal = {Nature Biotechnology},
keywords = {Wissenschaftsjournalismus science_journalism wissenschaftskommunikation},
month = {June},
timestamp = {2009-06-22T23:23:57.000+0200},
title = {Science communication reconsidered.},
year = 2009
}