%0 Journal Article %1 Rovai200777 %A Rovai, Alfred P. %D 2007 %J The Internet and Higher Education %K collaboration discussion e-learning education %N 1 %P 77 - 88 %R 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001 %T Facilitating online discussions effectively %U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W4X-4MV71T2-1/2/01092e6906fb977a946aeecea67f6c39 %V 10 %X This article presents a synthesis of the theoretical and research literature on facilitating asynchronous online discussions effectively. Online courses need to be designed so that they provide motivation for students to engage in productive discussions and clearly describe what is expected, perhaps in the form of a discussion rubric. Additionally, instructors need to provide discussion forums for socio-emotional discussions that have the goal of nurturing a strong sense of community within the course as well as group discussion forums for content-and task-oriented discussions that center on authentic topics. In order to facilitate discussions effectively, instructors should generate a social presence in the virtual classroom, avoid becoming the center of all discussions by emphasizing student-student interactions, and attend to issues of social equity arising from use of different communication patterns by culturally diverse students e.g., Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23; Rovai, A. P. (2003). Strategies for grading online discussions: Effects on discussions and classroom community in Internet-based university courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 89-107.

@article{Rovai200777, abstract = {This article presents a synthesis of the theoretical and research literature on facilitating asynchronous online discussions effectively. Online courses need to be designed so that they provide motivation for students to engage in productive discussions and clearly describe what is expected, perhaps in the form of a discussion rubric. Additionally, instructors need to provide discussion forums for socio-emotional discussions that have the goal of nurturing a strong sense of community within the course as well as group discussion forums for content-and task-oriented discussions that center on authentic topics. In order to facilitate discussions effectively, instructors should generate a social presence in the virtual classroom, avoid becoming the center of all discussions by emphasizing student-student interactions, and attend to issues of social equity arising from use of different communication patterns by culturally diverse students [e.g., Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23; Rovai, A. P. (2003). Strategies for grading online discussions: Effects on discussions and classroom community in Internet-based university courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 89-107].}, added-at = {2010-12-17T18:43:04.000+0100}, author = {Rovai, Alfred P.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23bf1e646ffd8965c423bca62b135717a/ajcann}, description = {ScienceDirect - The Internet and Higher Education : Facilitating online discussions effectively}, doi = {10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001}, interhash = {501b41bad607a1780a3ddfa01ef972b0}, intrahash = {3bf1e646ffd8965c423bca62b135717a}, issn = {1096-7516}, journal = {The Internet and Higher Education}, keywords = {collaboration discussion e-learning education}, note = {Special Section of the AERA Education and World Wide Web special Interest Group (EdWeb/SIG)}, number = 1, pages = {77 - 88}, timestamp = {2010-12-17T18:43:37.000+0100}, title = {Facilitating online discussions effectively}, url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W4X-4MV71T2-1/2/01092e6906fb977a946aeecea67f6c39}, volume = 10, year = 2007 }