Misc,

Implications of the Non-Observation of $^6Li$ in Halo Stars for the Primordial $^7Li$ Problem

, and .
(2022)cite arxiv:2204.03167Comment: 29 pages, 3 figures. Comments welcome.

Abstract

The primordial Lithium Problem is intimately connected to the assumption that $^7Li$ observed in metal-poor halo stars retains its primordial abundance, which lies significantly below the predictions of standard big-bang nucleosynthesis. Two key lines of evidence have argued that these stars have not significantly depleted their initial $^7Li$: i) the lack of dispersion in Li abundances measured at low metallicity; and ii) the detection of the more fragile $^6Li$ isotope in at least two halo stars. The purported $^6Li$ detections were in good agreement with predictions from cosmic-ray nucleosynthesis which is responsible for the origin of $^6Li$. This concordance left little room for depletion of $^6Li$ depletion, and implied that the more robust $^7Li$ largely evaded destruction. Recent (re)-observations of halo stars challenge the evidence against $^7Li$ depletion: i) lithium abundances now show significant dispersion, and ii) sensitive $^6Li$ searches now reveal only firm upper limits to the $^6Li/^7Li$ ratio. The tight new $^6Li$ upper limits generally fall far below the predictions of cosmic-ray nucleosynthesis, implying that substantial $^6Li$ depletion has occurred--by factors up to 50. We show that in stars with $^6Li$ limits and thus lower bounds on $^6Li$ depletion, an equal amount of $^7Li$ depletion is more than sufficient to resolve the primordial $^7Li$ Problem. This picture is consistent with stellar models in which $^7Li$ is less depleted than $^6\rm Li$, and strengthen the case that the Lithium Problem has an astrophysical solution. We conclude by suggesting future observations that could test these ideas. (abridged)

Tags

Users

  • @citekhatri

Comments and Reviews